Showing posts with label civil unrest. Show all posts
Showing posts with label civil unrest. Show all posts

Monday, 13 August 2012

Thomas Bresolin: Сучьи войны (Bitch war)

Following on from our post about Chris Burden, Martin Lang makes a connection between Burden and a contemporary artist who inflicts violence on himself, on others and encourages others to inflict violence on him. For 'Bitch War' Bresolin carried out an eight-day hunger strike culminating with a performance in which he was force-fed (see the video below).

 
Read Martin's full review on a-n online here (or see below) to find out how he links Bresolinand Burden and how he thinks Bresolin's eight-day hunger strike was not out of solidarity for prisoners, but for starving artists.



Thursday, 21 June 2012

On Militant Art: Part 2 - King Mob


King Mob 


King Mob was a radical English art collective, based in London, in the 1960s and 70s.  They sought to emphasize the cultural anarchy and disorder that they saw as being ignored in Britain at the time.

Aims

The brothers David and Stuart Wise (who had studied art in Newcastle) were the most dominant members of the group from the outset. The Wise brothers developed a combination of hard-edged politics (Russian nihilism and texts such as Pisarev’s “The Destruction of Aesthetics” fuelled notions of value, politics and the lack of a social function in art) and the disruptive potential of Dada and Surrealism

After they moved to the Notting Hill area of London, the brothers came into contact with Situationist International – two of whose members (Chris Gray and Don Smith) joined King Mob.  They also met, and worked with, John Barker who would later serve a prison sentence for his role in the Angry Brigade bombings. 

Techniques

King Mob used a variety of techniques which could be placed into two categories:

  1. Writing and propaganda.  This included: Graffiti, distribution of flyers, posters and their publication The King Mob Echo.  
  2. Direct Action. 

Writing and Propaganda

Their most famous graffiti slogan appeared as a message mocking commutors on a stretch of the Hammersmith and City line.  IT stayed there for several years, surviving until the 1990s (see below).    

Same thing day after day- tube - work - dinner - work - tube - armchair - TV - sleep - tube - work -how much more can you take? - one in ten go mad, one in five cracks up

In fact, King Mob took their name from a piece of graffiti that appeared on Newgate prison during the 1780 Gordon riots.  Rioters smeared the walls of the prison with the phrase “His Majesty King Mob” after having gutted the prison itself.   King Mob planned to paint Wordsworth’s house with the slogan “Coleridge Lives” but never realised this act. 

King Mob used posters and their publication The King Mob Echo to disseminate their political beliefs.  These publications sparked controversy by applauding murderers such as Jack the Ripper, Mary Bell, and John Christie.

They even went as far as to celebrate Valerie Solanas' 1968 shooting of Andy Warhol and to include a hit-list of several celebrities: Yoko Ono, Mick Jagger, Bob Dylan, Richard Hamilton, Mario Amaya (who was also shot by Solanas), David Hockney, Mary Quant, Twiggy, Marianne Faithfull, and IT editor Barry Miles.  Their publications were satirical and featured cartoon characters such as Andy Capp and the Bash Street Kids (from the Beano).  

Front cover graphic from a King Mob anti-art diatribe, circa 1968. Anonymous. Courtesy Tate archive. A dancing skeleton holding a burning torch captioned "anarchy" and wearing a sash captioned "communism", unfurls a scroll labeled "Mob Law", upon which is written a message from King Mob encapsulating the group’s ideas regarding culture - "the commodity which helps sell all the others".

Direct Action

Some of King Mob’s other ambitious, and unrealised, plans included blowing up a waterfall in the Lake District and hanging peacocks in a London park.  

One infamous stunt that was executed was a critique on the ownership of public and private space that saw the group, dressed as gorillas and pantomime horses, storm a private west London park and tear down its gating in order to open the park up as a children’s play ground.

A strong case can be made that King Mob's use of direct action was influenced by Black Mask.  In the 1960s King Mob spent time with Black Mask’s Ben Morea and co-signed at least one statement by Up Against the Wall Motherfucker!  In a 1967 anti-war rally the group was able to storm the Pentagon (which led to a severe beating).  Militant acts such as these distinguished King Mob and Black Mask from the intellectual French Situationists and the British Situationist support for Morea led to their expulsion from Situationist International. 

Like Morea’s Motherfuckers, King Mob was more extreme than, and suspicious of, most other “radicals”.  They were often an unwelcome presence at events for example: during the famous Hornsey Art College occupation they were thrown out for mocking the level of debate.  At the LSE occupation, student leaders removed their sexually explicit posters. 

Inspired by Black Mask's "mill-in at Macy's", twenty five members of King Mob stormed London's Selfridges, with one member, dressed as Father Christmas, to distribute all of the store's toys to children. The police were called and forced the children to return the toys.  King Mob claimed they were not as radical as Father Christmas, as "he breaks into people’s houses". 

King Mob's legacy includes their influence on Malcolm McLaren, who claimed to have been at the Selfridges event, and apparently adapted their Situationist models in the promotion of the Sex Pistols. 

 

Further Reading:

 

Monday, 8 August 2011

Twitter - Just Like a Phonebox Really


London rioted again last night.  On Thursday the Police shot and killed Mark Duggan in Tottenham.  Riots broke out and shops were burned and looted.  Last night (Sunday) saw a wave of “copycat criminal activity” (Met) across the capital: “Disorder spread to Enfield, Walthamstow and Waltham Forest in north London and to Brixton in the south of the city”. 
Reports from mainstream media (old media) quickly turned to the economic cost, how this could damage the Olympics next year (economics again) and how the trouble is perpetrated by minority groups.  There has been speculation that that some of the people involved were anarchists, and we all know the police don't like anarchists because they asked us to report on any known anarchists just last week (as if having a political belief is criminal).  Kit Malthouse, Deputy Mayor of London and Chair of the Metropolitan Police Authority said "Obviously there are people in this city, sadly, who are intent on violence, who are looking for the opportunity to steal and set fire to buildings and create a sense of mayhem, whether they're anarchists or part of organised gangs or just feral youth frankly, who fancy a new pair of trainers."
You can read more about how the Daily Mail blamed Twitter for the riots here.  I wonder what rioters of the past used to organise levels of greed and criminality?  I guess they might have spoken to each other or maybe used a telephone to call up their mates but, correct me if I'm wrong, I don't recall newspaper reports or police chiefs blaming payphones for the riots.  Twitter, and all social media, is just a means of communicating.  What sort of person you are and who you choose to communicate with is up to you, it has nothing to do with the service provider - just like payphones.   What we need to recognise is that there are a lot of old people who have no idea how the internet works, fear Twitter and Facebook and so put the blame on them rather than tackle real issues. 
What seems to me to be more important is a) why the police were so ineffective b) why is this happening in the first place and c) what the ramifications will be for free speech and our right to protest. 
On the first question, Mayor Boris Johnson issued a statement referring to a "Michael Duggan" - so incompetence goes right to the top!   BBC London's Paraic O'Brien said of the situation in Brixton:
We can only conclude that the police are scared of Brixton "the ghetto", were ill prepared or that the level of unrest was so great that the police had no chance - in which case the press have failed to communicate the level of severity.  

On the second point - the old press (and politicians) seem to have no interest in "why".  Rhetoric such as "outside agitators" and "anarchist groups" upsetting the "hardworking majority" (Tottenham MP David Lammy for example)is not helpful.  Richard Seymour (on Facebook) calls this "Crocodile tears from people who spend a lot of their time screwing over the hard-working majority...The point is to understand that this is an inevitable reaction to police murder, racism, and - more generally - the destruction of working class communities. The point is to get that what's happening can't be reduced to 'yob politics'".

On the third point (the ramifications for free speech and our right to protest): I've already pointed out that Social Media providers cannot be blamed for what users decide to discuss.  Users should also be free to discuss whatever they like, if they disclose criminal activity then they are potentially incriminating themselves but monitoring Twitter to see what people might do...  Can you imagine the police phone-tapping every call made from every telephone and arresting people based on what they insinuated they might do?  I can, sounds a bit Stalinist or reminiscent of the Stasi or Gestapo doesn't it?  Yet when this occurs with Social Media it's OK?  Richard Seymour points out (on Facebook) the police are using rumours (on FB/Twitter) as the basis for a crackdown.  "Cop car parked diagonally on Enfield town pavement while young kid was stopped, searched etc. Vans driving up and down, shops closing in panic."  See photos here.  The danger is not that Twitter can spread rumours of a riot but that rumours of a riot on Twitter reach a far bigger audience when people start seeing arrests, shops closing early and panic setting in in places like Enfield.  I'm sure word will soon spread - through Twitter or by word of mouth, it doesn't matter.